Post by Sheogorath on Jul 29, 2022 5:44:22 GMT
Following URLs contain original thread (now deleted) link as well as Bing archive, the MP4 still hosted, and the archive.ph in case Bing drops the cache.
incels.is/threads/i-dont-want-12-year-old-addison-gardner-from-buffalo-middle-school-to-be-forced-to-give-birth-to-my-baby-but-in-exchange-they-should-let-me-date-her.394618/
cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?d=2854841699727&w=uxVxtfaIdmT3OMo_X5nroWHsZ5krlouW
incels.is/data/video/644/644455-bff08503468ed8269788645e90bd33f3.mp4
archive.ph/o3BVc
a 90% warning is a 4-day auto ban
Dregster described it as "glowie thread with pedophilia desires" implying in respect to incels.is/threads/rules-and-faq.799/ it violated the "Do not sexualize pre-pubescent minors" rule, which is false since Addison Gardner is a mid-pubescent minor.
This would be obvious to Dregster since the whole topic is her talking about how she could become pregnant and want to abort that pregnancy.
Dregster also commented that it was "foid worship" though did not specify why that is. It doesn't seem like 'worship' to say "I don't want to force a young lady to give birth" or "I want to have a conversation with her on a date" or "she is a person not an object".
If mods are going punish comments about mid-pubescent minors in addition to pre-pubescent ones, rules should be amended.
If they are going to punish wanting -to date- a girl, they should amend rules to state that instead of wrongly characterizing it as -sexualizing-.
Parthenophilia is normal and healthy and the mods punishing this are secretly enacting IncelTear policy, while pretending not to so they appear based to the masses.
incels.is/threads/i-dont-want-12-year-old-addison-gardner-from-buffalo-middle-school-to-be-forced-to-give-birth-to-my-baby-but-in-exchange-they-should-let-me-date-her.394618/
cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?d=2854841699727&w=uxVxtfaIdmT3OMo_X5nroWHsZ5krlouW
incels.is/data/video/644/644455-bff08503468ed8269788645e90bd33f3.mp4
archive.ph/o3BVc
a 90% warning is a 4-day auto ban
Dregster described it as "glowie thread with pedophilia desires" implying in respect to incels.is/threads/rules-and-faq.799/ it violated the "Do not sexualize pre-pubescent minors" rule, which is false since Addison Gardner is a mid-pubescent minor.
This would be obvious to Dregster since the whole topic is her talking about how she could become pregnant and want to abort that pregnancy.
Dregster also commented that it was "foid worship" though did not specify why that is. It doesn't seem like 'worship' to say "I don't want to force a young lady to give birth" or "I want to have a conversation with her on a date" or "she is a person not an object".
If mods are going punish comments about mid-pubescent minors in addition to pre-pubescent ones, rules should be amended.
If they are going to punish wanting -to date- a girl, they should amend rules to state that instead of wrongly characterizing it as -sexualizing-.
Parthenophilia is normal and healthy and the mods punishing this are secretly enacting IncelTear policy, while pretending not to so they appear based to the masses.