Post by sub8male on Sept 21, 2022 14:08:15 GMT
archive.ph/ofels
As you can see, Fat Link argues against TigerFestival saying that ancestors used to have adult men with pubescent girls, and says that feminists disagree and would call it grooming. Important to note that he contrasted the ancestors with feminists.
So then I come and point out his poor analogy, and he only says "Low IQ: the post". I then say "it's okay broseph", and he says "LOL, I was talking about your post my nig", so I say:
"so you are unironically defenidning feminists.
good to know we have a feminist admin"
And he bans me, even though he argued against TigerFestival, who was arguing our ancient ancestors vs feminists.
It doesn't matter if someone doesn't like being called a feminist, if they support and defend feminist ideas, they shouldn't be immune to being called out for what they are. It's as if someone talked about how they support leftist ideas in politics, and you called them a liberal, or something like that. Or, how many times do people use the term "Christcuck" on that forum, to attack the Christiancels? This just seems like Fat Link is shielding himself from any criticism.
2 days later, Master literally had to change the rules and remove the misinformation rule:
archive.ph/5Acih
Also: this post right here, Fat Link claims people are allowed to question things with transparency, yet hard bans me, and claims I'm not allowed to complain (as seen above). He also says I was getting "out of pocket" with the other mods, basically meaning that I can't have arguments with them.
archive.ph/ukx4x
As you can see, Fat Link argues against TigerFestival saying that ancestors used to have adult men with pubescent girls, and says that feminists disagree and would call it grooming. Important to note that he contrasted the ancestors with feminists.
So then I come and point out his poor analogy, and he only says "Low IQ: the post". I then say "it's okay broseph", and he says "LOL, I was talking about your post my nig", so I say:
"so you are unironically defenidning feminists.
good to know we have a feminist admin"
And he bans me, even though he argued against TigerFestival, who was arguing our ancient ancestors vs feminists.
It doesn't matter if someone doesn't like being called a feminist, if they support and defend feminist ideas, they shouldn't be immune to being called out for what they are. It's as if someone talked about how they support leftist ideas in politics, and you called them a liberal, or something like that. Or, how many times do people use the term "Christcuck" on that forum, to attack the Christiancels? This just seems like Fat Link is shielding himself from any criticism.
2 days later, Master literally had to change the rules and remove the misinformation rule:
archive.ph/5Acih
Also: this post right here, Fat Link claims people are allowed to question things with transparency, yet hard bans me, and claims I'm not allowed to complain (as seen above). He also says I was getting "out of pocket" with the other mods, basically meaning that I can't have arguments with them.
archive.ph/ukx4x